Katherine Heigl
Katherine Heigl is Adopting a Baby This Week
Sep 10th
I am not really sure how to describe Katherine Heigl. She has so many good features, good tits, good ass, blonde hair. Seems like a perfect package. I was thinking about this when I was reading this story and I said to myself everything is good but her faceand then BINGO! That is what she is. A butterface. I will refer to her as that from here on.
Anyway, since she is so ugly that even her own husband doesn’t want to put his dick in her and the fact that she starred in Knocked Up and knows all the bullshit that comes with a pregnancy she has decided to adopt. She already has one sister that was adopting from Korea so she decided to get a baby from Korea as well. She says about pregnancy, “I am done with the hole idea of having my own children. [It] doesn’t seem like any fun. I don’t think it’s necessary to go through all of that.” Let’s face it, Heigl has been nicknamed “the pregnant chick from that movie” in Hollywood for years and she doesn’t want to become “that realpregnant chick.” Therefore she is butterface. Congratulations Katherine. I mean butterface.
In case you wanted to see Katharine Heigl NUDE, or as close as we’ve ever seen. Try here in the NSFW section.
Image via
Ashlee Simpson is a great sister- IDLYITW
CMA nominations announced, no one cares- Allie Is Wired
Hayden Panettiere hides from the paparazzi- Drunken Stepfather
Audrina Patridge is fucking HAWT in Maxim- Celeb News Wire
Cute college girl of the day- College Humor
Ashley Olsen is a cry baby- notorious news
Sex And The City stars still looking crazy ugly- IDLYITW
Whatever. Please STFU
Jun 12th
The LA Times is reporting that Katherine Heigl is not being considered for an Emmy this year, even though she won best supporting actress in last year’s ceremony. Was it because she’s a sanctimonious bitch and just didn’t cut the mustard this year? Hells no! Here’s what she had to say:
“I did not feel that I was given the material this season to warrant an Emmy nomination and in an effort to maintain the integrity of the academy organization, I withdrew my name from contention,” she tells Gold Derby. “In addition, I did not want to potentially take away an opportunity from an actress who was given such materials.” (LA Times)
Wow, I’ve never seen such a brilliant display of narcissism, sanctimony and condescension in such a concise, well crafted sentence. She should get an award for that. However, I don’t think they have a “Best Actress Who Is Really Hot, But Is Now A Burned Out Rotten Bitch And Hates Everyone And Never Shuts The Fuck Up About It“, Award. Too bad. Here’s Katharine as she should be: seen and not heard.
Katherine Heigl Loses Her Pants
Apr 17th
Or maybe Katherine Heigl lost her skirt. Whatever. The point is that she’s in underwear. But Katherine didn’t go all Anne Heche and start wandering the streets of L.A. half-dressed–nope, she’s filming “The Ugly Truth,” and the underwear look was part of the scene. IMDB tells me that the plot of the “The Ugly Truth” is:
“A romantically challenged morning show producer (Heigl) is reluctantly embroiled in a series of outrageous tests by her chauvinistic correspondent (Butler) to prove his theories on relationships and help her find love. His clever ploys, however, lead to an unexpected result.”
Hmmm, Gerard Butler could go all crazy on Heigl’s ass and sell her to sex slavery or a torture chamber, but I’m guessing the film is a comedy and that the “unexpected result” is actually the most expected one–that Heigl and Butler get together. Furthermore, I’m rather certain that Katherine’s character is “romantically challenged” by her choice in underwear–I mean tighty-whities are attractive in a very, very limited number of scenarios!
Attack of the 27 Clones
Jan 10th
My sentiments exactly, Katherine Heigl! I’d be freaked out upon seeing this lot of ladies as well. Seriously what is up with the clones?!? They are like Robert Palmer’s b’yatches in that old “Addicted to Love” video, only these are blonde and cheery instead of somber and robotic. Still and all, that shit freaks me out.
But what really freaks me out is how much money Katherine Heigl’s movie character theorectically would have had to have spent as a bridesmaid to have been in 27 weddings. Weddings ain’t cheap. Even for the most heinous bridesmaid dress you can pay a good $250, and that’s on the low side. Then factor in throwing a bridal shower, buying a gift for that, buying a wedding gift, and buying clothes for the entire weekend of never-ending events. So, figure on $1,000. And yet the new film “27 Dresses” wants us to believe that their main character has been a bridesmaid in 27 weddings. Listen, if someone is insane enough to be okay with spending upwards of $27,000 to be in their friends’ weddings you don’t have to think too hard about why that person is always a bridesmaid and never a bride.
Anyway, some hot girlies showed up at Katherine Heigl’s big premier night . . . and some not-so-hot ones. You can judge who is who . . .
